The New Rupee Symbol & Hammer-and-Sickle

I’m especially happy with the new Rupee symbol because it is designed by an alma mater, D Udaya Kumar, from IIT Bombay. Hearty congratulations to him!

pic01_200By rotating the symbol clockwise by around 30 degrees, you might be able to spot a certain resemblance to the hammer-and-sickle.

I wonder whether this is a relic from our past history with Russia.

By “our past history”, I’m not just referring to India’s traditional relationship with the former USSR and steadfast adherence to socialist principles before the big reforms of 1991.

I’m also talking about the past history of IIT Bombay.

During their formative years in the late ’50s and early ’60s, each IIT had some sort of affiliation with an overseas country e.g. IIT Kanpur with the USA, IIT Madras with the UK, and IIT Bombay with Russia.

There were traces of this affiliation with Russia even as late as 1985, which is the year I graduated from IIT Bombay. For example, there were many professors who’d earned their doctorates in Russia; the institute library had several Russian books, although we never actually found anyone actually reading or borrowing them!

And, above all, we had the notorious EC1030 mainframe computer that was made by a company called Robotron from East Germany, which, as readers would be aware, was a part of the former USSR until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. Touted as an IBM360 clone, this mainframe used to make us students go back-and-forth several times a week between hostel and computer center with its unerring frequency of breaking down. One week, the central processing unit would fail. By the time it was fixed, it would be turn of the memory unit to conk out. Then, the Hollerith Card Reader would refuse to read, well, the Hollerith cards in which our programs were punched on a heavy-duty typewriter-like equipment.  Since the user and operations manuals were all in Russian, the aforesaid professors who’d studied in Russia and had a working knowledge of the language had to be called in to translate them so that repairs could be undertaken.

While it’s possible to look back at all this with nostalgia now, let me assure you that EC1030 used to be one of our biggest pain areas during those days.

Let me take this opportunity to wish Dr. D Udaya Kumar a successful career at IIT Guwahati.

UPDATE DATED 5 NOVEMBER 2018:

Riffling through an old textbook during the recent occasion of Saraswathi Pooja – a religious festival unique to my native state of Tamilnadu – I came across the aforementioned Hollerith Card from back in my IIT Bombay days.

Hollerith Card

I explained to my Gen-Z daughter the long and arduous process of getting our programs run back in the day. Going by the amount of sympathy she showered on me, I think “Hollerith Card” may qualify as our generation’s “We walked barefoot three miles to school” plaint of our parents’ / grandparents’ generation.

Philosophical Question: This card has holes but, if there are no card readers left in the world to scan them, is the line of code on this card lost forever?

—–

One of the gems of the notorious Hostel 4 Central Wing Second Floor Hollerith Card Bloomer Collections was the first line of the BTP report from a senior inmate of the wing: “The problem of low cost housing has manyfolds”. Over 35 years later, Amazon says in a recent edition of Economic Times that it hopes to increase its sales in India by “manyfolds” this year.

I guess it’s impossible to ever get some English words right!

—–

Today’s MIRROR carries a cartoon comparing the Rupee logo with the logo of Communist Party of India (Marxist) aka CPM.

LOL:)

 

4 Comments

  1. UPDATE:

    Looks like I'm not the only one who has noticed the hammer-and-sickle in the new Rupee symbol. Today's Economic Times has several mentions of this, although none of them has pointed out the IIT Bombay angle.

  2. Anil

    RTI Activist exposed : Mismanagement and violation of guidelines in “Indian Rupee Symbol” design competition.

    According to RTI Documents :

    1. Non-eligible candidate was shortlisted in top five finalists. As candidate had submitted four designs.
    2. One finalist was in contact with PMO, Finance Ministry and RBI prior to competition.
    3. Design concept or brief was not put in front of jury along with Indian Rupee symbol design.
    4. No marks or grades were allotted to selected (2644) candidates design entries, in the process of shortlisting top five finalist design entries.
    5. Jury had spends less than 19 seconds on each design entries to analyze it .
    6. Three jury member (with Jury president Smt. Usha throat, Dy Governor RBI )were absent in two days long meeting dated 29th Sept. and 30th Sept. 2009. (Total 3 day meeting 29,30 and 16 Nov. 2009, Total Time 17 Hours)
    7. One jury member from Ministry of Culture was absent all day. (with presentation day 15-12-09)
    8. All seven jury member had never meet in this whole selection process in any given time.
    9. No records are available with Finance Ministry which could indicated, how many total design entries Finance Ministry had received ?
    10. Advertisement was only published in English language. It is violation of RAJBHASHA Act.

  3. Rajeev Jog

    I love it, totally subversive :)

Leave a Reply